Which Bible translation is best?
No single translation is best for everyone. Word-for-word translations such as the KJV, NASB or ESV stay closer to the wording of the original, while thought-for-thought ones such as the NLT read more easily. The best choice is a faithful translation you will actually read, compared now and then with a second one.
The Old Testament was written mostly in Hebrew, with a few passages in Aramaic, and the New Testament in Greek. Few readers today know these languages, so almost everyone meets the Bible in translation. That raises a fair question: with so many translations on the shelf, which one should you choose?
Translation is as old as the Bible’s readers
Reading God’s Word in another language is not a modern compromise. Something like it already happens in the Bible. After the exile, Ezra read the Law to the people of Jerusalem, and the Levites helped them follow it:
So they read in the book in the law of God distinctly, and gave the sense, and caused them to understand the reading.
Neh 8:8 · King James Version (1769)
Commentators read this verse in two ways. Albert Barnes and John Wesley think that giving the sense included rendering the Hebrew into Aramaic, the everyday language many had grown used to in Babylon. John MacArthur thinks it was mainly explanation in plain words. Either way, the point is the same: God’s Word was meant to be understood by ordinary people.
In the New Testament, an Ethiopian official was reading the prophet Isaiah on his way home when Philip came up to his chariot:
And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Isaiah, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest? And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
Acts 8:30–31 · King James Version (1769)
Barnes notes that the words of Isaiah quoted in this story (Acts 8:32–33) follow the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament made before the time of Christ, and Adam Clarke thinks the official was reading Isaiah in that Greek version, though John Gill thought he was reading the Hebrew. If Clarke is right, one of the first converts in Acts met Christ through the Scriptures in translation.
What makes a translation faithful
Paul reminds Timothy where the Scriptures come from:
All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2 Tim 3:16 · King James Version (1769)
MacArthur explains that the word means “God-breathed.” God used the minds, vocabulary and experience of the human writers, and what they wrote is His Word. A translation does not add to that inspiration. Its task is to carry the meaning of what God gave as accurately and clearly as possible into another language.
This very verse shows the kind of choices translators face. Clarke argues that the Greek is better rendered “Every writing Divinely inspired is profitable,” while MacArthur argues from similar Greek constructions that the familiar rendering, which calls all Scripture inspired by God, is accurate. Both agree that Scripture comes from God. Translators weigh questions like this in almost every chapter, which is why faithful translations can differ in wording while teaching the same truth.